[U]

Main
Registration
Login
Sunday, 2024-05-19,11:14 PM       

Personal messages()

[U]NITED Welcome little piggy | RSS
Site menu
[U] Player


 

 
Chatter Box
[U] Servers


Busy in the beehive
 
  • [U]09
  • [U]47
  • [U]00
  • pimp
  • [U]786
  • Greetz
  • [U]1337
  • [U]026
  • [U]06
  • [U]999
  •  

    Online

     

    • Page 1 of 1
    • 1
    Forum » EXPOSURE » Faux Newz » doves or smoke? (Means of Communication)
    doves or smoke?
    [U]09Date: Tuesday, 2009-01-20, 3:02 AM | Message # 1
    [U]Leader/Recruiter
    Group: Administrators
    Messages: 1319
    Reputation: 10
    Status: Offline
    To even talk about this out in the open is a major mistake, though to find ideas of how to communicate secretly with someone in this day and age is a divine challenge.

    -Private forums: apparently safe from the average bozo looking at what you are discussing, yet less safe when taking into consideration the owners of your webspace that have direct access, and robots that can find a password in a blink. Making the password extremely complicated would keep the robot or program busy for a few days but it WOULD find it.
    (advice to all forum owners, don't use the same password for everything you need a password for. You may force malicious beings to take advantage of your laziness and "hack" your fortress)

    I am avoiding the other known fact that compromises what is written in forums of robots sweeping the net for information then sold to governments and secret services, or programs' databases (like msn) poured into various research branches (homeland security, FBI, interpol). Radio waves are also sucked in and analyzed. Difficult to know if there still is a media free of operator pluggin you through while listening to your private phone call.

    -ventrilo/teamskpeak/skype: how safe are these programs? Are they filtered and watched by owners and those who own them? The phone isn't safe, as we know, but is it the same too for the former three?

    -letters: not as slow as when a messenger would be sent running across the land to deliver a message, but still not so immediate as the first two "unsafe" modern means of communication. Are letters scanned, confidential?

    -The SUB-net: who knows how to use this? Does info there actually stick out more than above the surface?

    Code language: this can be applied to all four above. A code can be cracked, and people are trained to do just that. Codes do however serve their purpose in shutting the enemy's lights off. And by the time the code is cracked, a new code is applied.
    Making a program that only special users of a group would be given could translate the coded text.

    Meeting people! Meet you in the park at noon. Exchange info with low voices away from electronic devices. This is when members, like before, have to trusted.

    All this to send each other results of last clan war, or samp gossip? I doubt that wink






    AAD: 85.17.97.10:3335 - Training: 81.167.157.3:7766 - GTA U: 85.204.196.64:8901 - Ventrilo: 85.17.146.33:11553
     
    [U]1776Date: Tuesday, 2009-01-20, 9:28 AM | Message # 2
    [U] cannabis consumption controller
    Group: [U] Member
    Messages: 35
    Reputation: 0
    Status: Offline
    Many codes are present which are actually quite elementary in their methods but have the possibility to become quite complicated when stacked in use with other existing codes. Sort of like how enigma never would have been bragging rights for Bletchley if not for that captured unit from a U boat. Regardless, there is no safe communication. Even in the end a mole or 5 or more can circumvent all your efforts, just look at how NB knows more about the Novoshame slobs than they know about themselves and their lack of direction. haha ninja haha

    In the long run, let them hear what has to be said along with many others hearing it as well. Messengers may vanish, but it is harder by far to make a message vanish.

    This is for the desk monkey tasked with reading this flagged thread: fuck

     
    [U]09Date: Tuesday, 2009-01-20, 12:21 PM | Message # 3
    [U]Leader/Recruiter
    Group: Administrators
    Messages: 1319
    Reputation: 10
    Status: Offline
    Ah balls. I was hoping more ideas and schemes from Marie Antoinette years.
    Exposing the truth and propaganda exposing the truth must be visible, yes. Worldwide schemes for real action against the machine is something that has to be under the radar, if you get my meaning (there we go, just revealed true intentions here)






    AAD: 85.17.97.10:3335 - Training: 81.167.157.3:7766 - GTA U: 85.204.196.64:8901 - Ventrilo: 85.17.146.33:11553
     
    [U]1776Date: Wednesday, 2009-01-21, 2:25 PM | Message # 4
    [U] cannabis consumption controller
    Group: [U] Member
    Messages: 35
    Reputation: 0
    Status: Offline

    Some reactions should be just as above, loud and vocal and of no mistake. It inspires the people to speak up and voice disapproval and not be just sheeple in the meadow. The more others know there is resistance, the more likely similar minds will come together to pursue that goal. It scares the hiding overlords and they tend to flee when they know the masses have [U]nited; they remember what happened to the French aristocrats when the revolution rolled into their lush and full palaces. The practice of this open display of disapproval being successful is also demonstrated in Venezuela where the people alone turned back an American/CIA sponsored and supported coup scaring the overlords out of the country and restoring their elected leader back into his rightful place as Presidente.

    Let them know they are exposed.
    Let them know we are organizing.
    They will know we are coming for them when they hear us marching in the streets!

     
    Forum » EXPOSURE » Faux Newz » doves or smoke? (Means of Communication)
    • Page 1 of 1
    • 1
    Search:



      | Copyright MyCorp © 2024 | |